I have, in the
past, expressed my thoughts on the entire mockery of the Censor (now
Certification) Board, censorship issues and its seriousness when the Amitabh
Bachchan-starrer Aarakshan went
through a fate similar to Vishwaroopam. While the thoughts and irking remains the
same, the tamasha played out and the
hardship of one of the most respected entertainer in the country made me
revisit the issue.
To put things in
perspective, Vishwaroopam is a well-made slick entertainer, easily comparable
to international standards. To quote a review from firstpost.com – ‘Perhaps this
is the first time that Kamal looks justified in his life-long obsession with
the technical flourish of Hollywood’.
Does it offend Muslims? Since the plot is about an Al Qaeda attempt to explode
a bomb and the protagonist’s mission to prevent it, the filmmaker ended up
showing their background, training methods etc.
Unfortunately, Al Qaeda has Muslim members and they could not have shown
that differently. Yes – the film could have possibly offended Jihadis and I am sure the protesters were not Jihadis. In
fact, there is a scene in the film in which the protagonist offers prayers
(namaz) before he goes for the final kill. Should they not be happy as the story
is about a good Muslim who takes on terrorists?
Why did they protest? My answer is simply another question – why did they
not protest vehemently in other states as they did in Tamil Nadu? Are the Muslims
in Tamil Nadu different from Muslims in other States? The answer lies in the
fact that Kamal gets hurt only if this movie not released or delayed in Tamil
Nadu. The impact won’t be much if it is
banned elsewhere. For the record, Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh have
more Muslims in terms of numbers as well as percentages as compared to Tamil
Nadu.
Logic behind the ban? While the reason
behind the ban in itself is debatable, what was amusing is the ‘significance of
2-week ban’. What would have happened if Kamal has not gone to High Court? Could he have released the movie after 2
weeks?
Did protesters achieve anything in the entire
process? No, would be my answer considering
cutting less than 10 minutes does not change the concept. On the other hand, the movie got huge
publicity in northern India and had a decent opening for its Hindi version,
which would not have happened otherwise. However, the real reason behind the protest still seems extremely unclear to me!
Do we need a Censor Board? In spite of the
Supreme Court’s decision on ‘Aarakshan’, which stated that the UP government had no
powers to suspend screening of the film on the ground that it may cause breach
of peace, States
continue to hold filmmakers for ransom. The latest we hear is that the Centre has set up a
committee to revisit the Cinematograph Act and recommend measures to enable the
Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to deal with “contemporary
requirements of certification”. I am certain all of us would agree that the
problem in hand is not the way films are censored or the lacunae in
Cinematograph Act. The problem is the harassment created by fringe groups and
the onus of States to protect their filmmakers.
Click on image to see a satirical take on future film certification, doing rounds on social networking sites |
Looks like these
things are here to stay as the latest we hear is some Christian groups protesting against Mani Rathnam's Kadal…… which just hit the theatres.
No comments:
Post a Comment